Logga in

Visa fullständig version : Styrketränande mäns självuppskattade proteinbehov och deras faktiska proteinintag


Eddie Vedder
2011-06-29, 14:27
BACKGROUND:

Protein needs for athletes are likely higher than those for the general population. However, athletes may perceive their protein needs to be excessively high. The purpose of this research was to compare collegiate athletes' perceived protein needs and measured protein intake to the recommended protein intake (RDI) for healthy adults (i.e. 0.8 g/kg/d) and to the maximum beneficial level for strength-trained athletes (i.e. 2.0 g/kg/day).

METHODS:

Perceived protein needs were quantified in 42 strength-trained collegiate male athletes by using a survey that asked the athletes to provide their perception about protein needs in specific quantitative terms (i.e. g/kg/d). Perceived protein needs were also determined by having the athletes select a daylong menu that they perceived to have adequate protein content from a collection of 5 isoenergetic menus, which differed in terms of protein content. Actual protein intake was quantified using 3-day food records and nutrient analysis. Single sample t-tests were used to compare protein intake and perceived protein needs to 0.8 g/kg/day and 2.0 g/kg/day.

RESULTS:

When asked to provide, in quantitative terms, protein needs for athletes, 67% of the athletes indicated "do not know." Of the remaining 33% of athletes, all gave values greater than 2.0 g/kg/d (mean 21.5+/-11.2 g/kg/d, p=0.14 vs. 2.0 g/kg/d). Based on the menu selection method for determining perceived protein needs, the athletes indicated that their protein needs were 2.4+/-0.2 g/kg/d, which was greater than the RDI for protein (p<0.0001) and tended to be greater than the maximally beneficial protein intake of 2.0 g/kg/d (p=0.13). Measured protein intake was 2.0+/-0.1 g/kg/d, which was greater than the RDI (p<0.0001) but not different from the maximally beneficial protein intake of 2.0 g/kg/d (p=0.84).

CONCLUSIONS:

Male collegiate athletes recognize that their protein needs are higher than that of the general population and consume significantly more protein than recommended in the RDI. However, it also appears that athletes are not aware of objective recommendations for protein intake and may perceive their needs to be excessively high. This study highlights the need for nutrition education in collegiate athletes, in particular nutrition education on macronutrient distribution and protein needs.

http://www.jissn.com/content/pdf/1550-2783-8-9.pdf

Fox EA et al. Perceived protein needs and measured protein intake in collegiate male athletes: an observational study. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2011 Jun 21;8(1):9. [Epub ahead of print]

Nitrometan
2011-06-29, 14:29
2g per kg, verkar rätt OK. Men såna här undersökningar där folk får uppskatta vad de äter och man sen följer upp det är skojiga.

SiSenior
2011-06-29, 14:31
However, it also appears that athletes are not aware of objective recommendations for protein intake and may perceive their needs to be excessively high.

Undra hur många som känner sig träffade ;)

Crocker
2011-06-29, 17:37
mean 21.5+/-11.2 g/kg/d, p=0.14 vs. 2.0 g/kg/d

Vad menas med det?

Att de åt +21.5g till -11.2g från medelvärdert? Mao variationerna.

C.E.J.
2011-06-29, 18:17
mean 21.5+/-11.2 g/kg/d, p=0.14 vs. 2.0 g/kg/d

Vad menas med det?

Att de åt +21.5g till -11.2g från medelvärdert? Mao variationerna.

Nej, intervallet 21.5-11.2 till 21.5+11.2, dvs 10.3 till 32.7.


edit: Jag förstod Nicklas titel som att studien handlade om att killarna trodde de åt x g protein per dag, men närmare undersökning visar att de överskattar hur mycket de fick i sig - ungefär som såna där studier där folk tror de äter en viss kalorimängd men egentligen äter mycket mindre/mer. Uppfattar dock inte att denna studie handlar om det?

Edenfäll
2011-06-29, 18:30
Nej, intervallet 21.5-11.2 till 21.5+11.2, dvs 10.3 till 32.7.


edit: Jag förstod Nicklas titel som att studien handlade om att killarna trodde de åt x g protein per dag, men närmare undersökning visar att de överskattar hur mycket de fick i sig - ungefär som såna där studier där folk tror de äter en viss kalorimängd men egentligen äter mycket mindre/mer. Uppfattar dock inte att denna studie handlar om det?

+1

Trodde samma sak.

Silencer
2011-06-29, 18:37
Objective recommendations är ju oftast tramsigt lågt.

Eddie Vedder
2011-06-30, 10:39
Uppfattar dock inte att denna studie handlar om det?

Nej här handlar det som deras självuppskattade behov, inte deras självuppskattade intag. Om det hade varit intag skulle titeln varit därefter. ;)

Objective recommendations är ju oftast tramsigt lågt.

Det var objektivt sagt. :)