Minskad mängd kroppsfett av ketogen diet + styrketräning vid kaloriöverskott

[King Grub]

Background

Ketogenic diets (KD) have become a popular method of promoting weight loss. More recently, some have recommended that athletes adhere to ketogenic diets in order to optimize changes in body composition during training. This study evaluated the efficacy of an 8-week ketogenic diet (KD) during energy surplus and resistance training (RT) protocol on body composition in trained men.

Methods

Twenty-four healthy men (age 30 ± 4.7 years; weight 76.7 ± 8.2 kg; height 174.3 ± 19.7 cm) performed an 8-week RT program. Participants were randomly assigned to a KD group (n = 9), non-KD group (n = 10, NKD), and control group (n = 5, CG) in hyperenergetic condition. Body composition changes were measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Compliance with the ketosis state was monitored by measuring urinary ketones weekly. Data were analyzed using a univariate, multivariate and repeated measures general linear model (GLM) statistics.

Results

There was a significant reduction in fat mass (mean change, 95% CI; p-value; Cohen’s d effect size [ES]; − 0.8 [− 1.6, − 0.1] kg; p < 0.05; ES = − 0.46) and visceral adipose tissue (− 96.5 [− 159.0, − 34.0] g; p < 0.05; ES = − 0.84), while no significant changes were observed in the NKD and CG in fat mass (− 0,5 [− 1.2, 0.3] kg; p > 0.05; ES = − 0.17 and − 0,5 [− 2.4, 1.3] kg; p > 0.05; ES = − 0.12, respectively) or visceral adipose tissue (− 33.8 [− 90.4, 22.8]; p > 0.5; ES = − 0.17 and 1.7 [− 133.3, 136.7]; p > 0.05; ES = 0.01, respectively). No significant increases were observed in total body weight (− 0.9 [− 2.3, 0.6]; p > 0.05; ES = [− 0.18]) and muscle mass (− 0.1 [− 1.1,1.0]; p > 0,05; ES = − 0.04) in the KD group, but the NKD group showed increases in these parameters (0.9 [0.3, 1.5] kg; p < 0.05; ES = 0.18 and (1.3[0.5, 2.2] kg; p < 0,05; ES = 0.31, respectively). There were no changes neither in total body weight nor lean body mass (0.3 [− 1.2, 1.9]; p > 0.05; ES = 0.05 and 0.8 [− 0.4, 2.1]; p > 0.05; ES = 0.26, respectively) in the CG.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that a KD might be an alternative dietary approach to decrease fat mass and visceral adipose tissue without decreasing lean body mass; however, it might not be useful to increase muscle mass during positive energy balance in men undergoing RT for 8 weeks.

Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 9 July 2018. Efficacy of ketogenic diet on body composition during resistance training in trained men: a randomized controlled trial.

https://jissn.biomedcentral.com/arti...970-018-0236-9

Tyvärr utan kontroll av dieten, bara uppmaningar.

[FknGainzBro]

Bs

Skickat från min G8141 via Tapatalk

[xcv]

Kanske dum fråga nu, men KD-gruppen;

"There was a significant reduction in fat mass (mean change, 95% CI; p-value; Cohen’s d effect size [ES]; − 0.8 [− 1.6, − 0.1] kg; p < 0.05; ES = − 0.46) and visceral adipose tissue (− 96.5 [− 159.0, − 34.0] g; p < 0.05; ES = − 0.84)"

No significant increases were observed in total body weight (− 0.9 [− 2.3, 0.6]; p > 0.05; ES = [− 0.18]) and muscle mass (− 0.1 [− 1.1,1.0]; p > 0,05; ES = − 0.04) in the KD group,

Om de fick en reducerad fettmassa, men kroppsvikten var oförändrad, då måste det ju ha tillkommit vikt någonstans? Eftersom det enligt citatet ovan inte var muskelmassa, var hamnade den vikten?

Och om kroppsvikten var oförändrad, hur kan det betraktas som ett kaloriöverskott?

[chadd]

Ursprungligen postat av xcv

Kanske dum fråga nu, men KD-gruppen;

"There was a significant reduction in fat mass (mean change, 95% CI; p-value; Cohen’s d effect size [ES]; − 0.8 [− 1.6, − 0.1] kg; p < 0.05; ES = − 0.46) and visceral adipose tissue (− 96.5 [− 159.0, − 34.0] g; p < 0.05; ES = − 0.84)"

No significant increases were observed in total body weight (− 0.9 [− 2.3, 0.6]; p > 0.05; ES = [− 0.18]) and muscle mass (− 0.1 [− 1.1,1.0]; p > 0,05; ES = − 0.04) in the KD group,

Om de fick en reducerad fettmassa, men kroppsvikten var oförändrad, då måste det ju ha tillkommit vikt någonstans? Eftersom det enligt citatet ovan inte var muskelmassa, var hamnade den vikten?

Och om kroppsvikten var oförändrad, hur kan det betraktas som ett kaloriöverskott?

Kroppsvikten gick ner.

[xcv]

Ursprungligen postat av chadd

Kroppsvikten gick ner.

Ok, men då är det väl ej att betrakta som ett kaloriöverskott?

[Melker2]

Ursprungligen postat av xcv

Ok, men då är det väl ej att betrakta som ett kaloriöverskott?

Man tappar en hel del vätskevikt när man drar ner på kolhydrater även om man stoppar i sig kaloriöverskott.