Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av King Grub
Brad Schoenfeld slår till igen.
|
Jag såg det också, borgar för kvalitet!
Såhär skriver han på sin sida.
”While it might seem obvious that lifting is superior to cardio for promoting muscle hypertrophy, a previous review by Konopka and Harber concluded that: "Collectively, studies observing skeletal muscle growth after aerobic exercise training observe an average increase of over 7%, which is comparable to the hypertrophy after resistance exercise training."
The issue with this paper is that they simply based conclusions on studies that investigated growth from aerobic exercise and compared the findings to results from a few "representative" resistance training studies to determine average RT gains. This isn't a valid method for drawing inferences on the topic. The proper approach is to conduct a meta-analysis that looks only at studies that directly compared aerobic training to lifting. In this way, there are rigid inclusion/exclusion criteria and results are converted to a common effect size for an "apples to apples" comparison of the magnitude of effect. We did so. The previous claims were (no surprise) refuted; it's not even close. Kudos to Jozo Grgić for spearheading the project.
https://link.springer.com/article/10...279-018-1008-z
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24508740”