Kan vi diskutera den här studien

[Okarin]

Tycker att den fått för lite utrymme från Tyngres skribenter och även Styrkelabbet. Hade gärna hört vad ni tänker om den. Kort sammanfattning från Kevin Hall, vars team också gjorde den ganska välkända studien om ultraprocessad mat, från hans Twitter:

20 adults without diabetes were admitted as inpatients to the NIH Clinical Center and randomized to consume ad libitum either a plant-based, low-fat (PBLF) diet or an animal-based, ketogenic, low-carbohydrate (ABLC) diet for 2 weeks followed immediately by the alternate diet. The PBLF diet was 75.2% carbohydrate, 10.3% fat, 14.5% protein and had a non-beverage energy density of 1.1 kcal/g. The ABLC diet was 75.8% fat,10.0% carbohydrate, 14.2% protein and had a non-beverage energy density of 2.2 kcal/g. Subjects consumed as much or as little as desired. Interestingly, the PBLF diet resulted in a spontaneous 689±73 kcal/d decrease in ad libitum energy intake compared to the ABLC diet (p<0.0001) and this difference was consistently observed in all subjects. Body composition analysis helps explain the apparent dissociation between weight loss and energy intake between the PBLF and ABLC diets. Only the PBLF diet resulted in significant loss of body fat whereas only the ABLC diet led to loss of fat-free mass.

Mina tankar är:

- Spontan minskning med ca 700 kcal per dag på plantbaserad kost. Men makrofördelning för viktnedgång? Med ~14%E protein är det kanske en del fettfri massa som ryker på sikt för en tränande.

- Hormonnivåer? Fettfattig med 10%E fett i kosten, med väldigt lite omega-3, kanske inte är super långsiktigt?


Studien: https://osf.io/preprints/nutrixiv/rdjfb/

Kevin Halls Tweet: https://mobile.twitter.com/kevinh_ph...02121246806017