King Grub
2015-04-12, 10:50
AIM:
To analyze the body composition, strength level, and the quality of life related to the health (QoL) in veteran sportsmen (>35 years old) in relation to sedentary ones (S), and to compare the result in the mentioned variables between two models of sports practice, long-distance runners (LDR) and bodybuilding practitioners (BBP).
METHODS:
One hundred forty-eight male participants took part and were distributed into three groups: 47 LDR (age=42.01±6.96 years), 49 BBP (age=45.14±7.04 years), and 47 S (age=43.71±8.75 years). Body composition, upper- and lower-limb strength level, and QoL were assessed.
RESULTS:
The LDR and BBP obtained better performance in countermovement jump (CMJ) than the S ones (+0.06 m, p<0.001). Significant differences were found in BMI and %fat mass, between BBP and S with relation to LDR (p<0.001). In relation to the effect of aging on body composition, the muscle mass is reduced in all groups controlled (LDR, BBP, and S). Additionally, the %fat mass is increased only in S group (p< 0.05). The CMJ performance is significantly reduced only in S group (-0.07 m, p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS:
The results suggested that the LDR as a model of active aging showed healthier values in BMI and %fat mass as well as greater results in QoL than BBP and S groups. Nevertheless, the LDR group showed similar values to S ones in muscle mass. The regression analysis performed showed that the sedentary habit predicts the %fat mass and CMJ performance.
Nutr Hosp. 2015 Apr 1;31(n04):1717-1725. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN TWO MODELS OF ACTIVE AGING AND ITS INFLUENCE ON BODY COMPOSITION, STRENGTH LEVELS AND QUALITY OF LIFE: LONG-DISTANCE RUNNERS VERSUS BODYBUILDERS PRACTITIONERS.
http://www.aulamedica.es/nh/pdf/8479.pdf
To analyze the body composition, strength level, and the quality of life related to the health (QoL) in veteran sportsmen (>35 years old) in relation to sedentary ones (S), and to compare the result in the mentioned variables between two models of sports practice, long-distance runners (LDR) and bodybuilding practitioners (BBP).
METHODS:
One hundred forty-eight male participants took part and were distributed into three groups: 47 LDR (age=42.01±6.96 years), 49 BBP (age=45.14±7.04 years), and 47 S (age=43.71±8.75 years). Body composition, upper- and lower-limb strength level, and QoL were assessed.
RESULTS:
The LDR and BBP obtained better performance in countermovement jump (CMJ) than the S ones (+0.06 m, p<0.001). Significant differences were found in BMI and %fat mass, between BBP and S with relation to LDR (p<0.001). In relation to the effect of aging on body composition, the muscle mass is reduced in all groups controlled (LDR, BBP, and S). Additionally, the %fat mass is increased only in S group (p< 0.05). The CMJ performance is significantly reduced only in S group (-0.07 m, p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS:
The results suggested that the LDR as a model of active aging showed healthier values in BMI and %fat mass as well as greater results in QoL than BBP and S groups. Nevertheless, the LDR group showed similar values to S ones in muscle mass. The regression analysis performed showed that the sedentary habit predicts the %fat mass and CMJ performance.
Nutr Hosp. 2015 Apr 1;31(n04):1717-1725. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN TWO MODELS OF ACTIVE AGING AND ITS INFLUENCE ON BODY COMPOSITION, STRENGTH LEVELS AND QUALITY OF LIFE: LONG-DISTANCE RUNNERS VERSUS BODYBUILDERS PRACTITIONERS.
http://www.aulamedica.es/nh/pdf/8479.pdf