Alone_in_the_dark
2009-08-18, 12:52
Nog för att jag är rudis på matte men att räkna på zombier? :laugh:
Only sufficiently frequent attacks, with increasing force, will result in eradication, assuming the available resources can be mustered in time,”
“If the timescale of the outbreak increases, then the result is the doomsday scenario: an outbreak of zombies will result in the collapse of civilization, with every human infected, or dead,” they wrote. “This is because human births and deaths will provide the undead with a limitless supply of new bodies to infect, resurrect and convert.”
How fast do we need to deal with the outbreak? Here’s the equation they used, where S = susceptibles, Z = zombies and R = removed. If an infection breaks out in a city of 500,000 people, the zombies will outnumber the susceptibles in about three days
http://img37.imageshack.us/img37/2211/picture9owd.png
http://www.mathstat.uottawa.ca/~rsmith/Zombies.pdf
Only sufficiently frequent attacks, with increasing force, will result in eradication, assuming the available resources can be mustered in time,”
“If the timescale of the outbreak increases, then the result is the doomsday scenario: an outbreak of zombies will result in the collapse of civilization, with every human infected, or dead,” they wrote. “This is because human births and deaths will provide the undead with a limitless supply of new bodies to infect, resurrect and convert.”
How fast do we need to deal with the outbreak? Here’s the equation they used, where S = susceptibles, Z = zombies and R = removed. If an infection breaks out in a city of 500,000 people, the zombies will outnumber the susceptibles in about three days
http://img37.imageshack.us/img37/2211/picture9owd.png
http://www.mathstat.uottawa.ca/~rsmith/Zombies.pdf