mikaelj
2009-08-11, 00:44
(gör ett försök, verkar inte varit uppe innan)
Protein content of diets dictates the daily energy intake of a free-ranging primate
Abstract
An important goal in nutritional ecology is to understand what governs the diet selection of free-living animals. Relevant information is however scarce because of the considerable challenges of collecting and interpreting such data. Here we use recent advances in nutritional theory to analyze data on food selection and nutrient intake by wild spider monkeys (Ateles chamek). We show that hypotheses traditionally used to explain vertebrate diet selection, such as energy or protein maximization, or avoidance of plant secondary metabolites, cannot explain the observed pattern of nutrient intake. Instead, spider monkeys maintained a stable daily protein intake but allowed total energy intake to vary as a function of the composition of available food items. A similar "protein-leverage effect" has been reported in humans for whom it appears to play a role in the development of obesity.
Results
Our results fit the prediction of the protein-leverage hypothesis: Spider monkeys regulated their daily intake of available protein much more tightly than they did either carbohydrates or lipids, and this regulation disproportionately influenced total energy intake. The protein-leverage hypothesis predicts that in the most extreme case, nonprotein energy intake (i.e., intake of nonstructural carbohydrates plus lipids; C + L) will decrease hyperbolically with an increasing proportion of protein in the diet, whereas protein gain will remain constant (Simpson and Raubenheimer 2005). The observed selection of nutrients by spider monkeys closely resembled the pattern expected by this model (Figure 2).
(...)
Mer i studien som finns gratis att läsa på http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/20/4/685
Populärvetenskaplig diskussion: http://www.sciencealert.com.au/news-nz/20091108-19540.html - "Protein need makes us obese"
Protein content of diets dictates the daily energy intake of a free-ranging primate
Abstract
An important goal in nutritional ecology is to understand what governs the diet selection of free-living animals. Relevant information is however scarce because of the considerable challenges of collecting and interpreting such data. Here we use recent advances in nutritional theory to analyze data on food selection and nutrient intake by wild spider monkeys (Ateles chamek). We show that hypotheses traditionally used to explain vertebrate diet selection, such as energy or protein maximization, or avoidance of plant secondary metabolites, cannot explain the observed pattern of nutrient intake. Instead, spider monkeys maintained a stable daily protein intake but allowed total energy intake to vary as a function of the composition of available food items. A similar "protein-leverage effect" has been reported in humans for whom it appears to play a role in the development of obesity.
Results
Our results fit the prediction of the protein-leverage hypothesis: Spider monkeys regulated their daily intake of available protein much more tightly than they did either carbohydrates or lipids, and this regulation disproportionately influenced total energy intake. The protein-leverage hypothesis predicts that in the most extreme case, nonprotein energy intake (i.e., intake of nonstructural carbohydrates plus lipids; C + L) will decrease hyperbolically with an increasing proportion of protein in the diet, whereas protein gain will remain constant (Simpson and Raubenheimer 2005). The observed selection of nutrients by spider monkeys closely resembled the pattern expected by this model (Figure 2).
(...)
Mer i studien som finns gratis att läsa på http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/20/4/685
Populärvetenskaplig diskussion: http://www.sciencealert.com.au/news-nz/20091108-19540.html - "Protein need makes us obese"